DIGITALIZATION IN LITERATURE LEARNING IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70489/3gycrd71Keywords:
digitization, literary learning, secondary education, digital stories, digital literacyAbstract
The way elementary school students access, understand, and create literary texts is transformed by digitalization. However, the use of technology in literature learning often stops at the transfer of printed books to screens without adequate pedagogical design. The purpose of this article is to evaluate the importance of digitization in literature learning in elementary schools, the various types of media that can be used, the advantages and disadvantages of its utilization, and the methods that can be applied to achieve it. This research conducted a literature review using a qualitative descriptive method. The selected coverage comes from books, articles, and reports from international institutions that discuss children's literature, digital stories, multimedia learning, digital literacy, and reading on screens. The data analysis process includes reduction, theme grouping, result comparison, and conclusion drawing. The research results show that when multimedia elements align with learning objectives, such as digital stories, e-books, digital comics, animated videos, story production projects, and engagement, vocabulary, story comprehension, writing skills, and digital literacy, students can be improved. However, irrelevant interactions, screen use without guidance, inappropriate device usage, excessive animations, and the lack of digital skills among teachers can reduce student comprehension and increase the learning gap. Therefore, digitalization should be seen as an enhancement and not a replacement for reading, discussion, appreciation, and value reflection activities. Content quality, teacher readiness, equitable access, child data protection, and literacy-focused learning evaluation are all factors that determine the success of implementation.
References
Buss, A., Takacs, G., & Kegel, C. B. T. (2015). Access and limitations of electronic storybooks for developing literacy in young children. Developmental Research, 35, 79–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2014.12.004
Caena, F., & Redecker, C. (2020). Alinear los marcos de competencia docente a los desafíos del siglo XXI: El caso del Marco Europeo de Competencia Digital para Educadores (DigCompEdu). European Journal of Education, 54(3), 356–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12345
Christ, T., Wang, X., Chiu, M. M., & Cho, H. (2020). Dando sentido con libros de aplicaciones multimodales para niños de jardín de infantes: Las relaciones entre las características del lector, las características del libro de la aplicación y los resultados de comprensión. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 47, 357–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2018.12.003
Clinton, V. (2020). Membaca dari kertas dibandingkan dengan layar: Tinjauan sistematis dan meta-analisis. Journal of Research in Reading, 42(2), 288–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12269
Delgado, P., Vargas, C., Ackerman, R., & Salmerón, L. (2018). Una meta-análisis sobre el impacto de los medios de lectura en la comprensión lectora: Mantén tus libros impresos. Educational Research Review, 25, 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.09.003
Furenes, M. I., Kucirkova, N., & Bus, A. G. (2019). A meta-analysis of children's reading on paper versus screen. Review of Educational Research, 91(4), 483–517. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654321998074
Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge.
Kucirkova, N. (2020). Children reading digital books: The past moving quickly toward the future. Child Development Perspectives, 13(4), 208–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12339
Mayer, R. E. (2019). Aprendizaje a través de múltiples medios (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316941355
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2010). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
The New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–92. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u
OECD. (2022). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of education and equity. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
Reeder, C. (2017). DigCompEdu: A European framework for the digital competence of educators. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/159770
Reed, S. M., Yau, C., Xu, Y., Muskat, T., Uvalle, J., & Cannata, D. (2020). Digital or print? Perbandingan pemahaman, kosakata, dan keterlibatan anak prasekolah dari buku cetak dan buku elektronik. AERA Open, 5(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419878389
Robinson, B. (2010). Digital storytelling: A powerful technology tool for the classroom of the 21st century. Theory Into Practice, 47(3), 220–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840802153916
Rosenblatt, L. M. (1989). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work. Southern Illinois University Press.
Sadik, A. (2010). Digital storytelling: A meaningful technology-integrated approach for engaged student learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58, 487–506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-008-9091-8
Singer, L. M., & Alexander, P. A. (2017). Reading across mediums: Effects of reading digital and print texts on comprehension and calibration. Journal of Experimental Education, 85(1), 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2016.1143794
Sharda, N., & Smeda, N. (2014). A comprehensive analysis of the effectiveness of digital stories in education. Smart Learning Environments, 1(6). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-014-0006-3
Takacs, Z. K., Swart, E. K., & Bus, A. G. (2015). Benefits and drawbacks of multimedia and interactive features in technology-enhanced storybooks: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 85(4), 698–739. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314566989
UNESCO. (2019). A new social contract for education: Reimagining our futures together. UNESCO.
UNESCO. (2022). Global Education Monitoring Report 2023: Technology in education—Tools for whom? UNESCO.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Yang, Y. T. C., & Wu, W. C. I. (2012). An experimental study over one year aimed at improving students' academic performance, critical thinking skills, and motivation to learn. Computers & Education, 59(2), 339–352.
Zhao, Y., & Sánchez Gómez, M. C. P. (2021). Competencia digital en la investigación de educación superior: Una revisión sistemática de la literatura. Computers & Education, 168, 104212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104212
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Yulhasni, Emilda Sulasmi , Faisal Rahman Dongoran (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




