The Dynamics of the Public Trust Crisis in the Free Nutritious Meals Program: A Sentiment Analysis of Viral Food Poisoning News on TikTok

Authors

  • Muhammad Al-Hadii Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, Indonesia Author
  • Elsha Ardhila Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, Indonesia Author
  • Sinta Puspita Sari Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, Indonesia Author
  • Annisa Aulia Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, Indonesia Author
  • Reviza Putra Syarif Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70489/perspektif.v4i2.1239

Keywords:

Public Sentiment, Free Nutritional Meal Program, TikTok, Public Trust, Policy Legitimacy

Abstract

The Free Nutritious Meal Program (MBG) is a government policy aimed at improving the nutritional quality of students and supporting the development of Indonesian human resources. However, the implementation of this program faces various challenges, particularly following the emergence of food poisoning cases that went viral on TikTok. This phenomenon has given rise to diverse public responses that shape the dynamics of public sentiment towards the MBG program. This study aims to analyze the dynamics of public sentiment towards the Free Nutritious Meal Program in the TikTok digital space and examine its implications for the crisis of trust and legitimacy of public policy. This study is based on theories of public opinion, digital communication, public sentiment, and the concepts of trust and policy legitimacy in the social media era. The study uses a qualitative method with a descriptive approach and a constructivist paradigm. Data sources come from TikTok user comments on news posts about food poisoning cases in the MBG program uploaded by online media accounts. Data collection techniques were carried out through observation, documentation and recording of comments relevant to the research focus. Data analysis used the interactive model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña, which includes data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. Data validity was tested through theory triangulation and source triangulation to increase the credibility of the research findings. The research findings show that negative sentiment dominates public discourse, characterized by criticism of food safety, food quality, and program oversight. Furthermore, TikTok's algorithm reinforces the reproduction of opinions through user interactions, thus shaping collective perceptions of the MBG program. The research findings also indicate that digital sentiment impacts public trust and the legitimacy of government policies. Therefore, the government needs to optimize transparent, responsive, and accountable public communication to maintain public trust in the MBG program

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Albaburrahim, A., Putikadyanto, A. P. A., Efendi, A. N., Alatas, M. A., Romadhon, S., & Wachidah, L. R. (2025). Program Makan Bergizi Gratis: Analisis Kritis Transformasi Pendidikan Indonesia Menuju Generasi Emas 2045. Entita: Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial Dan Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial. https://doi.org/10.19105/ejpis.v1i.19191

Andi Weyana Nurul Khatimah, Syamsu A Kamaruddin, & A. Octamaya Tenri Awaru. (2025). Rasionalisme Dalam Kebijakan Publik: Analisis Dampak Program Makan Bergizi Gratis Terhadap Kesejahteraan Pelajar. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Dan Riset Pendidikan, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.31004/jerkin.v3i4.815

Basit, M., & Ramadani, H. (2025). Analisis Implementasi Program Makan Bergizi Gratis Terhadap Perkembangan Ekonomi. Journal of Economics Development Research, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.71094/joeder.v1i2.105

Bodó, B. (2021). Mediated trust: A theoretical framework to address the trustworthiness of technological trust mediators. New Media and Society, 23(9), 2668–2690. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820939922

Ceylan, G., & Wood, W. (2026). From likes to trusts : How trust feedback reduces misinformation on social media. 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/23794607261423714

Fachri, F. A., Abdillah, M., Agustino, W., & Rena Herliska. (2025). Akuntabilitas Kebijakan Program Makan Siang Gratis Terhadap Aduan Keracunan Makanan melalui Media Sosial. Journal of Public Administration and Local Governance, 9(2), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.31002/jpalg.v9i2.3010

Fikri, M., Azhar, D. A., & Pradana, Y. (2025). Discourse About the News of Makan Bergizi Gratis (MBG) Program on Tiktok. Citizen : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia, 5(5), 1398–1409. https://doi.org/10.53866/jimi.v5i5.940

Flick, U. (2020). Doing Triangulation and Mixed Methods. In Doing Triangulation and Mixed Methods. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529716634

Guo, J. (2025). Identifying determinants for promoting public engagement via Chinese E-government TikTok in public health emergencies. 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0325967

Husairi, M. S., & Azzahra, S. M. (2025). Seberapa Besar Algoritma TikTok dalam Mempengaruhi Opini Publik tentang Kebijakan Kesehatan di Jakarta Selatan The Influence of TikTok ’ s Algorithm on Public Opinion Regarding Health Policy in South Jakarta. Edu Society: Jurnal Pendidikan, Ilmu Sosial, Dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 5(2), 810–815.

Komara, C. P., Pitriani, S., Silvya Sari, D., & Yulianti, D. (2025). Program Makan Bergizi Gratis di Tengah Krisis Food Waste. E-SOSPOL, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.19184/e-sospol.v12i2.53789

Krippendorf, K. (2013). Methodology, Content Analysis: An Introduction to its. International Encyclopedia of Communication.

Liu, D. (2025). The Balancing Acts: Communicating Legitimacy in Global Speech Governance. Social Media and Society, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051251340855

Maharani Imran, Venessa Agusta Gogali, & Fauzi Syarief. (2025). Media dan Komunikasi Kebijakan Publik: Analisis Frekuensi dan Sentimen Pemberitaan Program Makan Bergizi Gratis (MBG). Jurnal Ilmu Multidisiplin, 4(5). https://doi.org/10.38035/jim.v4i5.1438

McLaughlin, K. (2023). Netnography. In A Quick Guide to Research Methods for Dissertations in Education. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijegr.2021100104

Olsen, R. K., Tenenboim, O., Hess, K., Westlund, O., & Broersma, M. (2025). Platform paradoxes and public service media legitimacy : a cross-national study. Information, Communication & Society, 28(10), 1818–1835. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2024.2353783

Pramesti, R. F., Firdaus, A. A., Yulita, K., & Thoyyibah, M. (2025). ANALISIS EFISIENSI APBN ERA PRABOWO: KAJIAN EKONOMI DAN ANALISIS SENTIMEN PUBLIK. Jesya, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.36778/jesya.v8i2.2054

Qomarrullah, R., Suratni, S., Wulandari S, L., & Sawir, M. (2025a). Dampak Jangka Panjang Program Makan Bergizi Gratis terhadap Kesehatan dan Keberlanjutan Pendidikan. Indonesian Journal of Intellectual Publication, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.51577/ijipublication.v5i2.660

Qomarrullah, R., Suratni, S., Wulandari S, L., & Sawir, M. (2025b). Dampak Jangka Panjang Program Makan Bergizi Gratis terhadap Kesehatan dan Keberlanjutan Pendidikan. Indonesian Journal of Intellectual Publication, 5(2), 130–137. https://doi.org/10.51577/ijipublication.v5i2.660

Rustanta, A., Dwi Putranto, S., & Huang, P. (2025). Maintaining the Digital Public Space: Communication Ethics and Regulatory Challenges in the TikTok Era. Jurnal Komunikasi, 17(1), 63–83. https://doi.org/10.24912/jk.v17i1.32927

Solovev, K., Drolsbach, C., Demirel, E., & Pröllochs, N. (2025). TikTok Rewards Divisive Political Messaging During the 2025 German Federal Election arXiv : 2509 . 10336v1 [ cs . SI ] 12 Sep 2025. 1–45.

Suprapto, F. A., Praditya, E., Dewi, R. M., & Adiyoso, W. (2025). A Policy Implementation Review of the Free Nutritious Meal (MBG) Program. The Journal of Indonesia Sustainable Development Planning, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.46456/jisdep.v6i2.798

Syamsu, R., Putry, R., & Widyadhana, N. (2025). TINJAUAN NILAI GIZI DARI PROGRAM MAKAN BERGIZI GRATIS (MBG) PRESIDEN RI. JURNAL KESEHATAN TAMBUSAI, 6(4).

Tamba, D., & Kholikin, R. A. (2025). Media Sosial dalam Membangun Opini Publik atas Layanan Pemerintah: Kajian Literatur Interaksi Sosial Digital. Jejaring Administrasi Publik, 17(2), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.20473/jap.v17i2.79710

Verhoest, K., Latusek, D., Six, F., Maman, L., Papadopoulos, Y., Schomaker, R. M., & Trondal, J. (2024). Trust and distrust in public governance settings: Conceptualising and testing the link in regulatory relations. Journal of Trust Research, 14(2), 127–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2024.2383918

Wahyudi, F., Widuatie, R. E., Ramadhani, A., Dermawan, M. D., Pratama, A. F., & Lestari, I. (2025). Program Makan Bergizi Gratis Dalam Perspektif Etika Politik. Jurnal Multidisiplin West Science, 4(5). https://doi.org/10.58812/jmws.v4i5.2210

Zhang, Y., Gaggiano, J. D., Yongsatianchot, N., Suhaimi, N. M., Kim, M., Sun, Y., Griffin, J., & Parker, A. G. (2023). What Do We Mean When We Talk about Trust in Social Media? A Systematic Review. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings (Vol. 1, Issue 1). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581019

Downloads

Published

2026-08-31

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

The Dynamics of the Public Trust Crisis in the Free Nutritious Meals Program: A Sentiment Analysis of Viral Food Poisoning News on TikTok. (2026). PERSPEKTIF: Journal of Social and Library Science , 4(2), 69-75. https://doi.org/10.70489/perspektif.v4i2.1239