FLEXIBLE WORK RELATIONSHIP MODEL IN THE MAXIM DIGITAL TRANSPORTATION INDUSTRY IN GORONTALO

Authors

  • Lasmi H. Butudoka Universitas Negeri Gorontalo, Indonesia Author
  • Alifya Nurfadilah Husain Universitas Negeri Gorontalo, Indonesia Author
  • Aldi Bregi Sabbu Universitas Negeri Gorontalo, Indonesia Author
  • Sri Anggriani Moobiato Universitas Negeri Gorontalo, Indonesia Author
  • Indriyani Poiyo Universitas Negeri Gorontalo, Indonesia Author
  • Novita E. Habi Universitas Negeri Gorontalo, Indonesia Author
  • Rudi Harold Universitas Negeri Gorontalo, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70489/perspektif.v3i3.934

Keywords:

flexible work relationship model, digital transportation, Maxim, Gorontalo, drivers, gig economy

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the flexible work relationship model in the Maxim digital transportation industry in Gorontalo, focusing on working-hour flexibility, income, algorithmic control, and social protection for driver-partners. The research employs a descriptive qualitative approach, with data collected through in-depth interviews, participatory observation, and documentation. The findings indicate that work flexibility provides advantages for drivers in adjusting their work to personal needs; however, it also creates income uncertainty due to dependence on the number of orders and platform algorithms. Most drivers are not registered in social security schemes, exposing them to social and economic risks. Algorithmic control limits drivers’ autonomy despite their freedom to determine working hours. This study recommends the integration of social security coverage, greater algorithmic transparency, digital literacy enhancement, and collaboration among government, companies, and drivers to create a fair and sustainable work ecosystem.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Berg, J., Furrer, M., Harmon, E., Rani, U., & Silberman, M. S. (2020). Platform tenaga kerja digital dan masa depan pekerjaan: Menuju pekerjaan layak di dunia online. Organisasi Buruh Internasional.

De Stefano, V., & Aloisi, A. (2022). Pekerjaan platform: Analisis komparatif hubungan kerja. Jurnal Hubungan Industrial, 64(1), 3-24.

Graham, M., Hjorth, I., & Lehdonvirta, V. (2021). Tenaga kerja digital dan pembangunan: Dampak platform tenaga kerja digital global terhadap mata pencaharian pekerja. Media Baru & Masyarakat, 23(1), 70-88.

Organisasi Buruh Internasional (ILO). (2021). Pekerjaan dan pekerjaan layak dalam ekonomi digital: Temuan utama. Jenewa: ILO.

Kellogg, K. C., Valentine, M. A., & Christin, A. (2020). Algoritma dalam pekerjaan: Medan kendali yang diperebutkan yang baru. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 366-410.

OECD. (2023). Masa depan pekerjaan: Digitalisasi, ekonomi gig, dan kebijakan ketenagakerjaan. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Masrek , M. N. ., Baharuddin , M. F. ., & Syam , A. M. . (2025). Determinants of Behavioral Intention to Use Generative AI: The Role of Trust, Personal Innovativeness, and UTAUT II Factors. International Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 14(4), 378-390. https://doi.org/10.14419/44tk8615

Prassl, J. (2022). Manusia sebagai layanan: Janji dan batasan pekerjaan dalam ekonomi gig. Oxford University Press.

Sayekti, R., Batubara, A. K., Aditya, M., Purwaningtyas, F., & Syam, A. M. (2021). When the" Library as Place" Matters: A Case Study of an Academic Library. Library Philosophy & Practice.

Wood, A. J., Graham, M., Lehdonvirta, V., & Hjorth, I. (2021). Pekerjaan gig yang baik, pekerjaan gig yang buruk: Otonomi dan kendali algoritmik dalam ekonomi gig global. Work, Employment and Society, 35(1), 112-129.

Supiot, A. (2020). Di luar pekerjaan: Perubahan dalam pekerjaan dan masa depan hukum ketenagakerjaan. Cambridge University Press.

Zhang, T., & Li, H. (2023). Ekonomi gig, hak buruh, dan respons kebijakan di Asia. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Asia, 51(2), 201-223.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-16

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

FLEXIBLE WORK RELATIONSHIP MODEL IN THE MAXIM DIGITAL TRANSPORTATION INDUSTRY IN GORONTALO. (2025). PERSPEKTIF: Journal of Social and Library Science , 3(3), 137-143. https://doi.org/10.70489/perspektif.v3i3.934