POLICY COMMUNICATION IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SINGLE IDENTITY NUMBER (SIN)

Authors

  • Maksum Syahri Lubis Universitas Medan Area Author
  • Zoraya Alfathin Rangkuti Universitas Sumatera Utara Author
  • Muhammad Yusran Universitas Sulawesi Barat Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70489/6358hp72

Keywords:

Policy communication, policy implementation, Single Identity Number, public administration, tax governance

Abstract

The implementation of the Single Identity Number (SIN) policy through the integration of the National Identity Number (NIK) with the Taxpayer Identification Number (NPWP) represents a strategic effort by the Indonesian government to reform public administration and strengthen tax governance. Despite its strong regulatory foundation, the implementation of this policy at the local level has not fully achieved its intended outcomes. This study aims to analyze policy communication in the implementation of SIN at the local level, using a case study of the Primary Tax Office (KPP Pratama) Medan Belawan. Employing a qualitative descriptive approach, data were collected through in-depth interviews, observation, and document analysis. The analytical framework is based on Charles O. Jones’ policy implementation model, which emphasizes organization, interpretation, and application. The findings reveal that policy communication has not been implemented optimally due to limited human resources, budget constraints, inconsistent communication practices, and differences in policy interpretation between implementers and target groups. This study highlights that effective, consistent, and well-coordinated policy communication is essential to ensure public understanding and participation in the implementation of SIN.

References

Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032.

Bardach, E., & Patashnik, E. M. (2020). A practical guide for policy analysis: The eightfold path to more effective problem solving (6th ed.). CQ Press.

Bekkers, V., Edwards, A., & de Kool, D. (2013). Social media monitoring: Responsive governance in the shadow of surveillance? Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), 335–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.05.024.

Birkland, T. A. (2019). An introduction to the policy process: Theories, concepts, and models of public policy making (5th ed.). Routledge.

Bird, R. M., & Zolt, E. M. (2008). Tax policy in emerging countries. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 26(1), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1068/cav3.

Bovens, M., Goodin, R. E., & Schillemans, T. (2014). The Oxford handbook of public accountability. Oxford University Press.

Cairney, P. (2020). Understanding public policy: Theories and issues (2nd ed.). Red Globe Press.

Christensen, T., Lægreid, P., Roness, P. G., & Røvik, K. A. (2016). Organization theory and the public sector: Instrument, culture, and myth. Routledge.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Directorate General of Taxes. (2024). Annual report on tax administration reform. Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia.

Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2006). New public management is dead Long live digital-era governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(3), 467–494. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui057.

Edwards, G. C., III. (1980). Implementing public policy. Congressional Quarterly Press.

Gelb, A., & Clark, J. (2013). Identification for development: The biometrics revolution. Center for Global Development Working Paper, 315.

Gelb, A., & Diofasi Metz, A. (2018). Identification revolution: Can digital ID be harnessed for development? Center for Global Development.

Hill, M., & Hupe, P. (2014). Implementing public policy: An introduction to the study of operational governance (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Howlett, M. (2019). Designing public policies: Principles and instruments. Routledge Handbook of Public Policy, 281–296.

Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., & Perl, A. (2020). Studying public policy: Policy cycles and policy subsystems (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Jones, C. O. (1994). Public policy (2nd ed.). Harcourt Brace & Company.

Kassen, M. (2018). Adopting and managing open data: Stakeholder perspectives, challenges, and policy recommendations. Government Information Quarterly, 35(3), 443–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.05.005.

Kettl, D. F. (2015). The transformation of governance: Public administration for twenty-first century America. Johns Hopkins University Press.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.

Margetts, H., & Dunleavy, P. (2013). The second wave of digital-era governance. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 371(1987), 20120382. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2012.0382.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

OECD. (2019). Digital government review of Indonesia. OECD Publishing.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-30

How to Cite

POLICY COMMUNICATION IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SINGLE IDENTITY NUMBER (SIN). (2025). OPINI: Journal of Communication and Social Science, 2(3), 190-201. https://doi.org/10.70489/6358hp72