REVISITING CLASSICAL ORGANIZATIONAL COMMUNICATION THEORIES IN CONTEMPORARY ORGANIZATIONS: A CRITICAL REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT, HUMAN RELATIONS, AND BUREAUCRATIC THEORIES

Authors

  • Nesa Fatma Melisa Ritonga Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara Author
  • Fadhillah Nur Annisaa Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara Author
  • Nadya Rahmatika Ghania Mahidh Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70489/dr64k506

Keywords:

organizational communication theory, scientific management, human relations, bureaucratic theory, contemporary organizations

Abstract

This article critically examines the development and contemporary relevance of three classical organizational communication theories: Scientific Management, Human Relations, and Bureaucratic Theory. Using a qualitative library research approach with a structured critical literature review, the study analyzes selected scholarly sources to compare the historical foundations, communication assumptions, epistemological contributions, and limitations of each theory. The findings show that the development of organizational communication theory is not a simple linear shift from one perspective to another, but a continuing interaction among three analytical logics: control, participation, and formal legitimacy. Scientific Management frames communication as an instrument of efficiency and supervision, Human Relations emphasizes interpersonal interaction and employee participation, and Bureaucratic Theory highlights communication as a mechanism of procedural order and accountability. The study concludes that these classical theories remain relevant in contemporary, digital, and post-bureaucratic organizations because they continue to explain how organizations negotiate ongoing productivity, collaboration, and institutional structure today.

References

Ahmad, N. R. (2026). AI-enabled public governance in developing states: Service delivery gains, accountability risks, and a practical riskbased regulatory model. Lex Localis, 24(S1), 99–117.

Almhairat, A. (2025). Bureaucracy Theory Revisited: Max Weber’s Ideal Type and its Contemporary Relevance in Organizational Science. Australian Academic & Educational Services (AAES), Business and Administrative Studies, 2(3), 16–27.

Alshwayat, D., Elrehail, H., Shehadeh, E., Alsalhi, N., Shamout, M. D., & Rehman, S. U. (2023). An exploratory examination of the barriers to innovation and change as perceived by senior management. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 7(2), 159–170.

Biscaro, C., Bruni, E., Cornelissen, J., & Oswick, C. (2025). Metaphor and Organization Studies: Going beyond resonance to further theory and practice. Organization Studies, 46(5), 745–766.

Bringselius, L. (2023). Trust-based public management: Conceptualization and lessons from the Swedish trust reform. In Handbook on strategic public management (pp. 260–279). Edward Elgar Publishing.

Cesário, F., Rodrigues, A., Castanheira, F., & Sabino, A. (2023). The role of reaction to feedback in the relationship between performance management, job satisfaction and the leader–member exchange (LMX). EuroMed Journal of Business, 18(1), 129–144.

Cooley, S. (2023). Human relations theory of organizations. In Global encyclopedia of public administration, public policy, and governance (pp. 6329–6333). Springer.

Creswell, J. W. (2021). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. SAGE publications.

Ding, Y., Song, X., Zhu, Y., Xi, R., & Shi, Z. (2024). Digital technology and Chinese-style industrial modernization: Dynamic threshold effect based on R&D Human resources. Heliyon, 10(21).

Erbil, C. (2025). Governing by discipline: evidence on employee silence under authoritative bureaucracies. Employee Relations: The International Journal, 47(7), 1204–1226.

Garnett, J. L. (2024). Trends and gaps in the treatment of communication in organization and management theory. In Handbook of administrative communication (pp. 21–60). Routledge.

Gupta, M. J., Chaturvedi, S., Prasad, R., & Ananthi, N. (2022). Principles and practice of management. AG publishing house (AGPH Books).

Indainanto, Y. I., Dalimunthe, M. A., Sazali, H., & Kholil, S. (2023). Islamic Communication in Voicing Religious Moderation as an Effort to Prevent Conflicts of Differences in Beliefs. Pharos Journal of Theology, 104(4).

Joseph, J., & Sengul, M. (2025). Organization design: Current insights and future research directions. Journal of Management, 51(1), 249–308.

Klausen, K. K. (2024). Crises management as strategic coping. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration, 28(1), 25–42.

Kononenko, O., Ivanchenko, A., Gaivoronska, T., Khitrova, T., Semenko, S., & Kuzmin, V. (2024). Psychological and Social-Communication Aspects of HR Management Career in Wartime, Including Stress, Motivation, will and Efficiency of Working Conditions. Revista de Cercetare Si Interventie Sociala, 84.

Martusewicz, J., Wierzbic, A., & Łukaszewicz, M. (2024). Strategic transformation and sustainability: Unveiling the EFQM Model 2025. Sustainability, 16(20), 9106.

Miller, V. D., & Poole, M. S. (2024). Organizational communication theory and research (Vol. 8). Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.

Oliveira, L., & Justi, R. (2024). Developmental paths of teacher professional knowledge in modeling-based teaching: analysis from a longitudinal socio-historical perspective. Investigacoes Em Ensino de Ciencias, 29(1), 172–197.

Schiavi, G. S., Behr, A., & Marcolin, C. B. (2024). Institutional theory in accounting information systems research: Shedding light on digital transformation and institutional change. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 52, 100662.

Voth-Gaeddert, L. (2024). Improving use of SMART goals in science diplomacy: an overview of concepts and approaches. Journal of Science Policy & Governance, 1, 1–5.

Xu, J., & Lu, W. (2022). Developing a human-organization-technology fit model for information technology adoption in organizations. Technology in Society, 70, 102010.

Yadav, R., Sinha, M., & Srivastava, A. (2024). Employee relations: a comprehensive theory based literature review and future research agenda. Management Review Quarterly, 1–44.

Ye, Y. (2025). Re-examining Intercultural Competence in Mainland China through Actor-Network Theory. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 25(3), 61–72.

Zink, J., & DesRoches, K. (2023). Scientific Management, Bureaucracy, and the Emergence of the Modern Organization. Organizational Communication (Ver. 3).

Downloads

Published

2026-03-27

How to Cite

REVISITING CLASSICAL ORGANIZATIONAL COMMUNICATION THEORIES IN CONTEMPORARY ORGANIZATIONS: A CRITICAL REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT, HUMAN RELATIONS, AND BUREAUCRATIC THEORIES. (2026). OPINI: Journal of Communication and Social Science, 3(1), 75-92. https://doi.org/10.70489/dr64k506